Amélie started following the work of Chrisa D. Pornaris, University of Birmingham, School of Psychology.
Amélie added a CV.
Amélie started following the work of Mel West, University Of Birmingham, Psycholgy.
Amélie Strange research of the day: "Are some sabbits more competent and warm than others? The lay epistemologist is interested in object value, not in descriptive parameters" (Dubois & Beauvois, Swiss Jou... more
Papers
A comparison of children and adults’ judgements and decisions based on verbal uncertainty statements
Gourdon, A., & Villejoubert, G. (2009). A comparison of children and adults' judgements and decisions based on verbal uncertainty statements. In N.A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Children distinguish less well than adolescents the numerical meaning conveyed by verbal probabilities (e.g., Mullet & Rivet, 1991). Little is known, however, about children’s ability to grasp the directionality of verbal probabilities (Teigen & Brun, 1995). We expected children to only be influenced by directionality and congruence of statement framing with their goal. Thirty children and 29 adults made
probability judgements and decisions in a treasure hunt context. Results revealed that children are sensitive to the numerical meaning of verbal probabilities in decisions, and also in probability judgements related to goal!incongruent statement framings. The different demands implied by judging probabilities and decision!making will be discussed, as well as the independence of directionality and numerical value in adults’ interpretation of verbal probabilities.
